IMPACT OF SEX AND LOW-FLOW ON SURVIVAL AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT FOR SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS AND PRESERVED LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION
CCC ePoster Library. Guzzetti E. 10/26/19; 280313; 255
Dr. Ezequiel Guzzetti
Dr. Ezequiel Guzzetti
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.

You may also access this content "anytime, anywhere" with the Free MULTILEARNING App for iOS and Android
Abstract
References
Rate & Comment (0)
BACKGROUND: Little is known about sex-related differences amongst patients with paradoxical low-flow aortic stenosis (PLF AS). Objective: to examine whether there is a difference between women and men regarding the impact on outcomes and threshold of low-flow.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the clinical, Doppler-echocardiographic and outcome data prospectively collected in 1490 patients with severe AS and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who underwent AVR in a large tertiary referral Canadian center. In our cohort, there were 946 (63%) men and 544 (37%) women. Normal flow was present in 1006 (67%) and PLF in 484 (33%) patients. Baseline characteristics according to sex and flow-status are shown in table 1. During a median follow-up of 2.4 [1.04-4.29] years 167 patients died. Overall, patients with PLF had increased 30-day (10 [2.3%] vs 8 [0.9%], p=0.03) and cumulative all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]=1.60 [95% CI: 1.17-2.18], p < 0.01). PLF remained independently associated to increased mortality after multivariate adjustment for clinical variables, LVEF and mean gradient (HR=1.53 [95% CI: 1.11-2.11], p < 0.01). Altogether, women had higher 30-day mortality than men (2.3% vs 0.8%, p=0.026), but similar cumulative mortality (p=0.39). Using the guidelines threshold of 35 ml/m2, PLF was associated with increased mortality in women (HR=1.95 [95% CI: 1.18-3.22], p < 0.01) but not in men (HR=1.25 [95% CI: 0.79-1.85], p=0.39). Using spline curve analysis, optimal thresholds were obtained for men (40 ml/m2, panel A) and women (32 ml/m2, panel B). Using these sex-specific thresholds, PLF was independently associated with increased mortality in both women (adjusted HR=2.05 [95% CI: 1.21-3.47], p < 0.01) and men (adjusted HR=1.54 [95% CI 1.02-2.32], p=0.042) (panel C) and improved risk stratification in the whole cohort. In univariate analysis, women with PLF had higher overall mortality than men with PLF (HR=1.37 [1.08-.74], p=0.009), but this difference was no longer significant after adjusting for age, surgical risk score and LVEF (HR=1.17 [0.92-1.50], p=0.21).

CONCLUSION: In patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF undergoing AVR, PLF is associated with increased overall mortality using the guidelines SVi cut-point ( < 35 ml/m²) in the whole cohort and in women, but not in men. Defining PLF using the sex-specific thresholds of 40 ml/m2 for men and 32 ml/m2 for women predicted mortality in both sex categories. Our results provide support to the utilization of sex-specific thresholds to define low-flow and enhance risk stratification in AS.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about sex-related differences amongst patients with paradoxical low-flow aortic stenosis (PLF AS). Objective: to examine whether there is a difference between women and men regarding the impact on outcomes and threshold of low-flow.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the clinical, Doppler-echocardiographic and outcome data prospectively collected in 1490 patients with severe AS and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who underwent AVR in a large tertiary referral Canadian center. In our cohort, there were 946 (63%) men and 544 (37%) women. Normal flow was present in 1006 (67%) and PLF in 484 (33%) patients. Baseline characteristics according to sex and flow-status are shown in table 1. During a median follow-up of 2.4 [1.04-4.29] years 167 patients died. Overall, patients with PLF had increased 30-day (10 [2.3%] vs 8 [0.9%], p=0.03) and cumulative all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]=1.60 [95% CI: 1.17-2.18], p < 0.01). PLF remained independently associated to increased mortality after multivariate adjustment for clinical variables, LVEF and mean gradient (HR=1.53 [95% CI: 1.11-2.11], p < 0.01). Altogether, women had higher 30-day mortality than men (2.3% vs 0.8%, p=0.026), but similar cumulative mortality (p=0.39). Using the guidelines threshold of 35 ml/m2, PLF was associated with increased mortality in women (HR=1.95 [95% CI: 1.18-3.22], p < 0.01) but not in men (HR=1.25 [95% CI: 0.79-1.85], p=0.39). Using spline curve analysis, optimal thresholds were obtained for men (40 ml/m2, panel A) and women (32 ml/m2, panel B). Using these sex-specific thresholds, PLF was independently associated with increased mortality in both women (adjusted HR=2.05 [95% CI: 1.21-3.47], p < 0.01) and men (adjusted HR=1.54 [95% CI 1.02-2.32], p=0.042) (panel C) and improved risk stratification in the whole cohort. In univariate analysis, women with PLF had higher overall mortality than men with PLF (HR=1.37 [1.08-.74], p=0.009), but this difference was no longer significant after adjusting for age, surgical risk score and LVEF (HR=1.17 [0.92-1.50], p=0.21).

CONCLUSION: In patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF undergoing AVR, PLF is associated with increased overall mortality using the guidelines SVi cut-point ( < 35 ml/m²) in the whole cohort and in women, but not in men. Defining PLF using the sex-specific thresholds of 40 ml/m2 for men and 32 ml/m2 for women predicted mortality in both sex categories. Our results provide support to the utilization of sex-specific thresholds to define low-flow and enhance risk stratification in AS.
21
    This eLearning portal is powered by:
    This eLearning portal is powered by MULTIEPORTAL
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)

MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.


Performance Cookies

Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.


Save Settings